Five minutes · no pitch

What is actually stopping you from using AI in your practice?

We are two people looking at building something for firms your size, and we would rather find out we are wrong now than after we have built it.

Joseph Craig & Sirrele Steinfeld

Short version of where we are. The technology stopped being the hard part a while ago. What has not been solved is confidentiality, the ethics rules, supervision, and the fact that if a tool does a week of associate work in an hour, it takes your revenue with it.

Nobody selling into firms seems to be dealing with that last one. We think it is the actual problem. We would like to know if you agree.

No follow-up unless you ask for it. There is a place at the end for that.

01

How many attorneys at your firm?

02

Primary practice area?

03

Where is your firm right now with AI?

04

What is the real blocker?

Pick as many as apply.
05

How do you bill most of your work?

06

If a tool cut a task from ten hours to one, what happens?

The question we most want a straight answer to.
07

Which of these would you actually pay for?

Rank the ones you would consider. Leave the rest blank. 1 is most.
Someone builds your AI policy, tool selection, and supervision protocol
CLE-qualifying training for your attorneys on using AI within the rules
Custom automation for your intake, review, or drafting workflow
Expert witness and opposition research, delivered per matter
A deep tool built only for your practice area
Internal tooling your staff can run without engineers
08

Anything we are getting wrong?

The most useful box on the page.
09

Want us to follow up?

Leave it blank if not. No list, no newsletter.
Responses are stored so we can read them together. Nothing is shared anywhere else.